1. The Threat Is Real — And Growing
Law firms are aggressively targeting businesses with websites that are not accessible to people with disabilities. These are not isolated incidents — this has become a systematic, high-volume legal industry.
By the Numbers (2025)
- Over 5,000 federal ADA digital accessibility lawsuits were filed in 2025 — a 37% increase over 2024
- Nearly 70% of lawsuits targeted e-commerce and retail websites
- The majority of defendants were small businesses with under $25 million in annual revenue
- 46% of cases in H1 2025 involved repeat defendants — companies being sued a second, third, or fourth time
- Projections for 2026 suggest filings could exceed 5,500 federal cases
- AI tools are making it even easier for individuals to file complaints without an attorney
Mizrahi Kroub LLP alone has filed over 1,100 website accessibility lawsuits in a single year using standardized complaints and a handful of repeat plaintiffs. They primarily target small to mid-sized businesses that lack the resources to mount a defense, forcing quick settlements typically ranging from $5,000 to $25,000.
2. Who Is Being Targeted?
New York, Florida, California, and Illinois account for over 74% of all filings, but lawsuits are expanding into new states every year. If your website is accessible from these states, you may be at risk regardless of where your business is physically located.
Industries Most Frequently Sued
- Restaurants — Image-heavy menus without alt text
- Hotels & hospitality — Booking widgets that trap keyboard navigation
- Dental & medical practices — Old templates with no accessibility
- Salons & spas — Booking platforms rated poorly for accessibility
- E-commerce & retail — Product images, checkout flows, filters
- Real estate — MLS widgets, image galleries
- Auto dealers — Complex inventory search systems
- Law firms — WordPress themes with no skip links (yes, the irony)
A Portland yoga studio paid $11,500 in settlement plus attorney fees for a problem that takes roughly 2 hours to fix. That's the reality: settlements vastly exceed the cost of compliance.
3. What Makes a Website Accessible?
Website accessibility means that people with disabilities — including visual, auditory, motor, or cognitive impairments — can perceive, understand, navigate, and interact with the web. The standard courts and regulators reference is the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level AA.
Key Requirements
Alternative Text for Images
Every meaningful image needs a text description so screen readers can convey the content to visually impaired users. Without alt text, a screen reader just announces "image, image, image" — a blind user can't understand what they're looking at.
Keyboard Navigation
All website functionality must be accessible using the keyboard alone, without requiring a mouse. This includes navigation menus, forms, buttons, modal dialogs, and interactive widgets. Users must never get "trapped" in a component.
Clear Headings and Structure
Proper heading hierarchy (H1, H2, H3, etc.) organizes content logically for screen readers. Screen reader users navigate by headings the way sighted users scan a page visually. Skipping levels or using headings for styling breaks this navigation.
Sufficient Color Contrast
Text must maintain at least a 4.5:1 contrast ratio against its background for normal text and 3:1 for large text (18pt+ or 14pt+ bold). Light gray text on white backgrounds is one of the most common violations.
Captions and Transcripts for Media
All pre-recorded audio and video content needs text alternatives — captions for video, transcripts for audio. Live video needs real-time captions. This serves deaf and hard-of-hearing users.
Properly Labeled Forms
Every form input needs an associated <label> element. Placeholder text alone is not sufficient — it disappears when the user starts typing, and many screen readers don't announce it. Error messages must be clear and programmatically associated with the relevant field.
Focus Indicators
Interactive elements must show visible focus indicators so keyboard users know where they are on the page. Removing the default browser outline (a common CSS practice) without providing a replacement violates WCAG.
4. WCAG 2.1 vs. 2.2 vs. 3.0: What's the Difference?
WCAG 2.1 (June 2018)
The current standard referenced by most courts and the DOJ. Adds 17 criteria to WCAG 2.0, with significant focus on mobile accessibility, low vision, and cognitive disabilities. Level AA is the target for legal compliance.
WCAG 2.2 (October 2023)
The newest published standard. Adds 9 new success criteria addressing authentication (no CAPTCHA puzzles), dragging movements (alternatives required), consistent help location, and minimum target size for interactive elements (24x24 CSS pixels). Removes criterion 4.1.1 (Parsing) as modern browsers handle this automatically.
Key additions in 2.2:
- Focus Not Obscured (AA) — Focused elements can't be hidden behind sticky headers or modals
- Dragging Movements (AA) — Any drag action must have an alternative (click, tap)
- Target Size Minimum (AA) — Interactive targets at least 24x24 CSS pixels
- Consistent Help (A) — Help mechanisms appear in same location across pages
- Accessible Authentication (AA) — No cognitive function tests (CAPTCHAs, memory puzzles)
- Redundant Entry (A) — Don't make users re-enter information already provided
WCAG 3.0 (W3C Working Draft)
A major redesign still in draft. Replaces the A/AA/AAA conformance model with a scoring system (Bronze, Silver, Gold). Introduces new testing methodologies and broadens scope to cover apps, documents, virtual reality, and emerging technologies. Not yet a standard — but forward-thinking businesses should be tracking its development.
Key changes expected in WCAG 3.0:
- Scoring-based conformance instead of pass/fail criteria
- More granular contrast measurement (APCA model replacing simple ratios)
- Broader technology scope (native apps, XR, IoT)
- Usability testing requirements alongside technical criteria
5. How to Check Your Website's Accessibility
You can use free online tools to scan your website and identify accessibility issues.
Automated Scanning Tools (Free)
- WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool — Highlights potential problems and offers guidance on how to fix them. Visit wave.webaim.org
- Google Lighthouse — Built into Chrome DevTools (press F12, go to Lighthouse tab), provides an accessibility score and identifies common WCAG violations
- axe DevTools — Browser extension from Deque Systems providing detailed WCAG violation reports
Important Limitation
Automated tools can only detect approximately 30–57% of accessibility issues. They are a good starting point, but a comprehensive assessment also requires manual testing with actual assistive technologies like screen readers (NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver) and keyboard-only navigation. This is why professional audits go beyond automated scans.
Manual Testing Checklist
Put your mouse away and try using the site with just your keyboard:
- Tab — Does focus move logically through links, buttons, and form fields?
- Shift+Tab — Can you move backwards?
- Enter — Does it activate the focused button or link?
- Escape — Does it close popups and modals?
- Can you see where focus is at all times? (visible focus indicator)
- Does a "Skip to content" link appear when you first press Tab?
- Can you complete the entire checkout or booking flow by keyboard?
6. Four Steps to Protect Your Business
Scan Your Website (Free, 5 minutes)
Run your website through the WAVE tool to get an immediate snapshot of your accessibility issues. This gives you a count of errors, contrast failures, and structural problems. It's free, instant, and requires no technical knowledge.
Fix the Underlying Issues
This is the most important step. No widget or overlay can substitute for actually fixing your website's code. Common fixes include adding alt text to images, correcting heading hierarchy, ensuring keyboard navigation works, improving color contrast, adding captions to videos, and labeling form fields.
If your website is older than 3–4 years, it may be more cost-effective to rebuild with accessibility baked in from the start. Expect an additional 10–20% on top of typical web design costs for an accessible site.
Set Up Ongoing Monitoring
Accessibility isn't a one-time fix. Every time you add a blog post, update a product image, or change a page layout, you can reintroduce violations. Set up regular scanning (monthly at minimum) and review new content before publishing.
Stay Informed on Legal Changes
Accessibility law is evolving. The DOJ Title II rule, state-level legislation, and the European Accessibility Act are all raising the bar. Subscribe to updates and reassess your compliance at least quarterly.
7. Why Accessibility Overlay Widgets Don't Work
Accessibility overlay tools (AccessiBe, UserWay, EqualWeb, and others) promise compliance with a single line of JavaScript. The reality is very different:
- The FTC fined AccessiBe $1 million (January 2025) for deceptive claims that its AI product could make websites accessible. The final order was approved in April 2025.
- Over 800 accessibility professionals signed an open letter opposing overlay tools
- The National Federation of the Blind called AccessiBe "misleading and harmful"
- 400+ lawsuits have named overlay tools or sites using them
- Overlays can actually make accessibility worse by interfering with screen readers, creating keyboard traps, and breaking existing accessible functionality
The fundamental problem: overlays try to fix the presentation layer without changing the underlying code. A missing alt text attribute can't be accurately generated by AI guessing what an image contains. A broken heading hierarchy can't be fixed by JavaScript rearranging the DOM. Keyboard traps in third-party widgets can't be resolved by an overlay script.
Real compliance requires real code changes. That's what I do — and it's why my clients pass both automated scans and manual assistive technology testing.
8. What Does Compliance Actually Cost?
The cost of proactive compliance is dramatically lower than defending even one lawsuit.
Proactive Compliance
- Professional accessibility audit: $297–$500
- Full remediation (small site): $500–$2,000
- Full remediation (mid-size site): $2,000–$5,000
- Ongoing monitoring: $100–$200/month
Cost of a Lawsuit
- Typical settlement: $5,000–$25,000
- Attorney fees (your side): $5,000–$25,000+
- Emergency remediation: $3,000–$10,000
- Second lawsuit risk: 46%
Bottom line: Spending $500–$5,000 on proactive compliance is dramatically cheaper than a single lawsuit that could cost $10,000–$50,000+. And nearly half of defendants get sued again.
9. Key Legal Developments to Watch
DOJ Title II Rule
Requires state and local government websites to meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA by April 2026 (populations 50,000+) or April 2027 (under 50,000). While this directly applies to government sites, it further raises expectations for all digital accessibility.
ADA 30 Days to Comply Act (H.R. 6453)
Bipartisan bill introduced December 2025 that would require a 30-day notice-and-cure period before any ADA Title III lawsuit can be filed. Not yet passed — do not count on it as protection.
European Accessibility Act (EAA)
Effective June 2025, requiring accessibility compliance for digital products across the EU. Relevant if you serve international customers or have European operations.
ADA.gov Official Guidance
The Department of Justice maintains official web accessibility guidance at ada.gov/resources/web-guidance.
10. Resources & Further Reading
Free Tools
- WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool — Free online scanner
- Google Lighthouse — Built into Chrome DevTools (F12 → Lighthouse tab)
- axe DevTools — Free browser extension from Deque Systems
- NVDA Screen Reader — Free, open-source screen reader for Windows
Official Standards
- WCAG 2.1 — W3C Recommendation
- WCAG 2.2 — W3C Recommendation
- WCAG 3.0 Working Draft — W3C Editor's Draft
- ADA.gov Web Accessibility Guidance
News & Analysis
Find Out Where Your Website Stands
I offer a free accessibility scan for any business website. You'll get a summary of your WCAG violations, your legal exposure level, and a clear recommendation — no obligation.
Request Your Free Audit